Chapter 2 · Verse 48
Krishna has just introduced the idea of acting without attachment to results. Here he gives it a name and a precise definition: yoga is the equanimity you bring to action, not the action itself.
yoga-sthaḥ kuru karmāṇi saṅgaṃ tyaktvā dhanañjaya | siddhyasiddhyoḥ samo bhūtvā samatvaṃ yoga ucyate ||
1.Plain meaning
Established in yoga, perform your actions, abandoning attachment, O Dhananjaya. Be the same in success and failure. This evenness of mind is called yoga.
2.Line by line
saṅgaṃ tyaktvā
siddhyasiddhyoḥ samo bhūtvā
samatvaṃ yoga ucyate
3.What is really happening
A.The sequence is precise: ground first, act second
Krishna is not saying act well and you will feel steady. He is saying be steady, then act. The direction of causality matters enormously here. Most people try to secure the outcome first so they can feel settled. The verse reverses this completely: the settling has to precede the action, or you are always at the mercy of results.
B.Saṅga names what actually destabilizes you
The 'attachment' being dropped is not fondness for good outcomes. It is the invisible thread connecting your sense of who you are to whether things work out. When you act from that thread, every result is a referendum on your worth. The moment the thread is seen clearly, its grip loosens. That seeing is itself the beginning of yoga.
C.Success and failure as equal weather
The metaphor of weather is useful here: you do not become a different person when it rains. Siddhi and asiddhi are presented as two kinds of weather that pass through the same space. The space itself does not contract in bad weather or expand in good weather. Yoga is the maintenance of that space, not the engineering of the forecast.
D.A working definition, not a spiritual ideal
When Krishna says 'samatvaṃ yoga ucyate,' the verb ucyate means 'is called' or 'is said to be.' This is not mystical proclamation. It is a working definition offered to someone confused about what to aim for. You now know the target: not victory, not spiritual attainment, not divine favor. Evenness. That is all. And it is enough.
4.Modern parallel
Person A is a founder who has spent six months building a product launch. The launch day comes. If it goes well, they are flooded with relief and expansiveness. If it goes badly, they spiral into self-doubt and spend two weeks reviewing every decision. The outcome runs them. They cannot tell where the work ends and their identity begins. Person B has done the same six months of work with the same intensity. On launch day they are fully present and watching carefully. The launch goes badly. They note it, understand what they can, adjust, and keep working at the same pace. Not because they do not care. Because their sense of who they are is not riding on the number. The work is real; the attachment to the outcome is not. That is the only difference between them.
5.Name diagnostic
Dhananjaya
Dhana (wealth, prize) + jaya (conqueror): 'conqueror of wealth' or 'winner of prizes'Arjuna is being addressed as the one who wins things. The name is quietly ironic at exactly this moment: Krishna is about to tell him to drop his attachment to outcomes, and he calls him by the name that means 'the guy who takes the prize.' The epithet names the very psychological habit the teaching is asking him to examine. It is not flattery. It is a mirror.
→What comes next
Verse 2.49 continues the teaching by contrasting action done in yoga (the steadiness just defined) with action done purely for results, calling the latter 'far inferior.' Krishna sharpens the distinction between a person who acts from evenness and one who acts from craving. When ready, say: "2.49"